Metamindz Logo
FoundingFree, no signup

Equity and Cap Table Planner

Describe your startup and founding team, and get a cap table structure to take to your solicitor, with the dilution modelled and the UK-specific parts explained.

Flat illustration of a pie chart splitting into wedges that shrink as further rings of ownership are added around it

A startup cap table records who owns what. Early on it has four moving parts: the founders, an option pool for the people you have not hired yet, whatever converts when you raise, and the investors who come in at a priced round. The numbers matter less than understanding what each round does to the rest: a 15% pool and a 20% seed round leave founders with about 68% of what they started with, before anyone has done anything wrong. Describe your startup and team above and this tool proposes a structure, models the dilution, and lists what to take to your solicitor. It is a planning aid, not legal, tax or financial advice.

Two or three sentences (at least 40 characters)
Each founder and what they do (at least 20 characters)
Where are you on funding?

Given one, the dilution is modelled on it. Left blank, a conventional round for your stage is assumed and stated.

A planning aid, not legal, tax or financial advice. We are not regulated advisers. What you type is not stored unless you submit the email form, which says so.

How to use the Equity and Cap Table Planner

  1. Describe what you are building

    The product, who it is for, and how far along you are. Two or three sentences is enough; traction changes the answer more than the sector does.

  2. Be honest about the team

    Each person, what they do, full-time or not, taking a salary or not, and what they brought in. Unequal contributions are the whole point of the exercise, so say where they are unequal.

  3. Set your funding stage

    Bootstrapped, raising pre-seed, raising seed, or post-seed. It changes the pool size, the instruments and what is still negotiable.

  4. Read the open questions first

    These are the decisions your description did not settle. Answering them with your cofounders is worth more than the table above them.

  5. Take the adviser list to a solicitor

    The output ends with specific questions for a startup solicitor and an accountant. That list is the most valuable part: it turns an hour of their time into a decision rather than an explanation.

Splitting equity between founders

Almost every founder asks for a formula, and there is not one. An equity split is a negotiation between people who are about to spend years together, and the numbers are the easy part. What this tool does is show you what the numbers do, so you can have that conversation with the arithmetic in front of you instead of a feeling.

The instinct is an even split, and for two people going in equally, full-time, from the same standing start, it is usually right. It gets wrong when the contributions are not equal and nobody wants to say so. One person is full-time and the other is not. One has been at it eighteen months and the other joined last quarter. One is taking a salary and the other is not.

Those gaps do not need to be settled in the founder split. Differential vesting handles a time difference. A cash-versus-equity trade handles the salary difference. A smaller initial grant with milestones handles someone who is not yet all in. The worst outcome is an even split that one person privately thinks is unfair, because that conversation does not go away, it just gets more expensive.

  • Vest everything, founders included. Four years with a one-year cliff is the convention, and the reason it exists is the cofounder who leaves in month eight holding a third of the company.
  • Decide what happens if someone leaves before you need to know. Good leaver and bad leaver provisions are a ten-minute conversation now and a lawsuit later.
  • Write down what each person committed to, not just what they own. Hours, runway, salary expectations.
  • Do not leave a slice unallocated for "a future cofounder". Either you are hiring one, in which case it comes out of the pool, or you are not.

Option pools, and the bit that catches people out

An option pool is equity set aside for employees you have not hired yet. At seed, investors will expect somewhere around 10% to 15%, sized against the hires in your plan for the next 18 months rather than a round number.

Here is the part that surprises founders. An investor will usually require the pool to sit in the pre-money, which means it comes out of the existing shareholders and not out of the new money. So a "20% round" with a fresh 10% pool dilutes you by closer to 30%. It is standard, it is negotiable at the margins, and it is much easier to argue about before you have signed a term sheet.

Size it from the actual hires. Two senior engineers at 0.5% to 1% each, a first commercial hire, a head of something. If you cannot name the roles, the pool is guesswork and probably too big.

What dilution actually does

Dilution is not a loss. Your percentage goes down and the thing it is a percentage of goes up, which is the entire point of raising. Founders who optimise for their percentage rather than the value of their holding end up owning most of something small.

What you do need is to see it coming. Two rounds and a pool, each individually reasonable, can take two founders from 50% each to the high twenties without anyone making a bad decision. That matters because control and motivation both live in those numbers, and because the third round is the one where it starts to hurt.

The tool above models it stage by stage and shows the arithmetic rather than asserting the result. If you cannot see how 100% became 62%, you have not learnt anything you can use in a negotiation.

The UK-specific parts: SEIS, EIS, ASAs and EMI

Most cap table advice online is American, and the instruments are different here. Getting this wrong is expensive in a way that is hard to undo.

SEIS and EIS are the schemes that make UK angel investment work. They give your investors substantial income tax relief, which is often the reason a cheque gets written at all. They come with conditions on the company, the shares and the money, and the shares have to be ordinary with no preferential rights. Get advance assurance from HMRC before you raise, not after.

A US-style SAFE is not the standard UK instrument. Here it is usually an advance subscription agreement, which is a payment for shares issued later and is SEIS-compatible if drafted properly, or a convertible loan note, which is debt and generally is not. That distinction decides whether your angels get their relief.

EMI options are the tax-advantaged way to give employees equity in the UK, and they need an HMRC valuation and a scheme in place before you grant anything. Promising someone "1%" in an offer letter with no scheme behind it is a promise you cannot keep cleanly.

  • Get SEIS/EIS advance assurance before you take money, not after.
  • Use an advance subscription agreement rather than a convertible if your investors need SEIS relief, and have a solicitor draft it.
  • Set up an EMI scheme and get the valuation before you promise anyone options.
  • Keep one class of ordinary shares for as long as you can. Preference shares can break SEIS eligibility for everyone.
  • File everything at Companies House properly and on time. A messy share register is found in diligence, always at the worst moment.

What this tool cannot do

It is not legal, tax or financial advice, and we are not regulated advisers. It reads a description you typed and proposes a structure to discuss. Issuing shares, SEIS and EIS eligibility, EMI valuations and anything to do with tax need a startup solicitor and an accountant, and they are cheaper than the mistakes.

It has not seen your articles, your existing share register, any agreement you have already signed, or the term sheet in your inbox. Anything already committed constrains the options in ways it cannot know, which is why the output lists open questions rather than pretending to certainty.

It will not value your company. Valuation is a negotiation with an investor, not a calculation, and any number a language model gives you for it is invented.

Run the planner and nothing you paste is stored. Submit the form to unlock more runs or to download the plan and what you typed comes to us with your address, which is what the tick box on that form says. Either way, keep names and anything commercially sensitive out of it: you can describe a founding team as "two technical, one commercial, one part-time" and get the same answer.

Frequently asked questions

If both are full-time from the same starting point, an even split is usually right and arguing about 55/45 costs more than it saves. If the contributions are genuinely unequal, handle the difference with vesting schedules, a salary-versus-equity trade, or a smaller initial grant with milestones, rather than with a lopsided headline split that one person resents.

You do not have to give away 10% to get a CTO.

The single largest line on most early cap tables is a technical cofounder, and it is permanent. We put experienced CTOs on retainer instead, which costs money rather than ownership and stops when you have your own team. If you are modelling a technical cofounder grant right now, it is worth knowing what the alternative costs.

See how fractional CTO works

Related from Metamindz

Published