Cloud
We ask candidates to design a secure network and service layout, explain identity boundaries, and make explicit trade-offs between resilience, complexity and cloud cost.
- AWS
- AWS S3
- Azure
- Azure Front Door
- GCP
- Google Cloud
- Vercel
UK, Europe, USA
Infrastructure recruitment that tests operational judgement across cloud, delivery, security and observability.
Technical screening by developers and CTOs is included.

We recruit DevOps, platform and cloud engineers across AWS, Azure and Google Cloud environments. Technical screening covers infrastructure as code, container platforms, delivery automation, observability, security and the practical operation of production systems.
When to hire DevOps and cloud engineers: A product team formalising its platform. A cloud migration or infrastructure rebuild. A team improving deployment reliability and observability.
We clarify whether the role is primarily platform engineering, cloud architecture, site reliability, deployment automation or hands-on infrastructure support.
We ask candidates to design a secure network and service layout, explain identity boundaries, and make explicit trade-offs between resilience, complexity and cloud cost.
We probe container behaviour, Terraform state, deployment safety and Kubernetes failure modes with scenarios involving failed rollouts, drift and service discovery.
We present an incident signal and ask what they inspect first, which telemetry is missing, how they limit impact and what changes should follow the post-incident review.
Infrastructure engineers must stay composed during incidents, communicate impact and uncertainty clearly, and balance delivery speed with security, reliability and the needs of the developers using the platform.
The interview examines what candidates do when systems change, fail or need to scale, not only whether they recognise a tool.
Service selection, networking, security boundaries, cost and resilience trade-offs.
CI/CD, infrastructure as code, containers and safe deployment practices.
Monitoring, incident reasoning, debugging and learning from production failures.
Tool names are not enough. Across every role, we look for technical depth, disciplined use of AI and an honest approach to solving unfamiliar problems.
We keep asking why and how until we reach the underlying behaviour. Candidates should understand what their framework, runtime, database, browser, cloud service or design tool is doing for them, how they work behind the scenes (and why), and how they would investigate a failure without relying on copying fixes from ChatGPT.
We expect candidates to use AI productively, but never as a substitute for judgement. They need to explain how they verify generated code, designs and tests, protect confidential data, catch unsafe assumptions and remain accountable for the result. We expect them to use MCPs, skills, and goals. So basically - we are looking for structured AI-assisted work, not vibe coding, vibe designing or vibe testing.
Strong candidates have a can-do mindset and will investigate, experiment and learn when the answer is not obvious. At the same time, they are fair and transparent about what they know, what they have not done before and when they need support.
Give us a few details about the role and your hiring plans. We'll assess your needs and get back to you with a practical next step.
Our recruitment experience includes AWS, Azure, GCP and related services such as AWS S3, Azure Front Door, CloudWatch and serverless functions.
Yes. We define the operational ownership and tooling required, then adapt sourcing and assessment to the role.
Yes. Technical screening can cover Kubernetes, Docker, Terraform, CI/CD and the architecture decisions around them.